Our Methodology
Transparent approach to creating educational software and tool comparisons
Our Approach
At Compare Majestic, we believe in providing transparent, educational comparisons that help users understand different software tools and platforms. Our methodology is designed to be neutral, factual, and based on publicly available information.
Research Process
Information Gathering
We collect information from official websites, documentation, user guides, and publicly available resources. We do not rely on hearsay or unverified claims.
Feature Analysis
We analyze the features, capabilities, and characteristics of each tool or platform based on official documentation and publicly available information.
Neutral Presentation
We present information in a balanced way, highlighting both strengths and limitations without bias toward any particular solution.
Educational Focus
Our goal is to educate and inform, not to sell or promote. We provide context to help users understand different options.
Information Sources
- Official Websites: Primary source for feature information and official statements
- Documentation: Technical documentation, user guides, and help resources
- Public Announcements: Official press releases and public communications
- Publicly Available Reviews: Third-party reviews and analyses from reputable sources
- Community Resources: Open-source information and community-contributed content
What We Don't Do
No Paid Promotions
We do not accept payment to feature or promote specific products or services in our comparisons.
No Affiliate Bias
Our comparisons are not influenced by affiliate relationships or potential commissions.
No Recommendations
We do not make specific recommendations or tell users which option to choose.
No Guarantees
We do not guarantee outcomes or make promises about the effectiveness of any tool or service.
Comparison Criteria
When creating comparisons, we typically evaluate tools and platforms based on:
Features & Functionality
What the tool can do and how it works
User Experience
Interface design and ease of use
Integration Options
How well it works with other tools
Pricing Structure
Cost and pricing model information
Target Audience
Who the tool is designed for
Support & Resources
Available help and learning materials
Limitations & Disclaimers
Information Accuracy
While we strive for accuracy, software features and pricing can change frequently. We encourage users to verify current information on official websites.
Subjective Elements
Some aspects of software evaluation, such as user experience, may contain subjective elements. We try to present multiple perspectives where possible.
Coverage Limitations
We cannot cover every feature or use case for each tool. Our comparisons focus on the most commonly relevant aspects.
No Personal Testing
Our comparisons are based on available information rather than extensive personal testing of each tool.
Updates & Maintenance
We periodically review and update our comparisons to reflect significant changes in the tools and platforms we cover. However, users should always verify current information before making decisions.
If you notice outdated information or have questions about our methodology, please contact us.
Transparency Commitment
We are committed to transparency in our comparison process. This methodology page explains our approach, and we welcome questions about how we create our educational content.
Our goal is to provide useful, educational information that helps users understand their options without bias or commercial influence.